When recruiting for posts working with vulnerable young people and adults the interviewing and selection process is critical.
Having a clear process that adds extra rigour to the selection process by identifying negative behavioural indicators is vital to safeguarding children and vulnerable adults.
A group of key managers involved in recruitment and selection were asked to review the existing selection processes. Information was gathered on the number of interviewees, the number of appointments, and the reasons why panels recommended not offering a post because the applicant was deemed ‘not safe’. Using this data a range of questions were designed to elicit information about behavioural traits that have impact on safeguarding in recruitment.
Existing practise using behavioural interviews showed that:
– They were carried out on two or three preferred candidates following the completion of ‘traditional’ interview and assessments (depending on how many candidates were taken through and how long the interview lasted this could consume an additional 2 and 24 hours of management time for each post).
– They were conducted by 2 managers using 6 sets of questions and that some of the questions were very similar offering the potential to reduce the questions being asked and shorten the interviews.
– It was common that they took between one and two hours for each candidate
the number of people trained to carry out behavioural interviewing had dwindled placing a considerable time burden on those remaining.
– There had been no safeguarding allegations made against staff during the period behavioural interviewing was carried out.
– If behavioural interviewing could be somehow incorporated into the selection process it offered the potential of only inviting potentially ‘safe’ candidates for traditional interview.
Key Learning Points:
– That an ‘on-line’ approach to initial selection of candidates incorporated elements of behavioural interviewing would help sift out unsuitable candidates before traditional interviewing and assessments were conducted.
– The value of behavioural interviewing is in narrative responses to questions posed and does not lend itself to multiple choice type responses.
Key Learning Points:
– Organisations will achieve considerable time savings of managers previously used intensively in post-interview screening.
– Comparison of candidate responses to questions can be more easily achieved when recorded via an on-line process rather than by manual note taking during interviews.
To receive more information on this topic: